|
LAWS
Investment, Trade Regulation, Law
on Taxation,
Labor Law, Law on insurance, Land and construction,
Law on foreign exchange foreign, Law on marriage & family, Trademark Law
LAW
CONCERNING MARKS
TRADE
NAMES AND ACTS OF UNFAIR
COMPETITION
CHAPTER 1 |
CHAPTER 2 |
CHAPTER 3 |
CHAPTER 4 |
CHAPTER 5 |
CHAPTER 6 |
CHAPTER 7 |
CHAPTER 8 |
CHAPTER 9 |
CHAPTER
10 | CHAPTER 11 |
CHAPTER 12 |
CHAPTER 13 |
CHAPTER 14 |
CHAPTER 15
| CHAPTER 16
Chanter
4
Collective
Marks
Article 16
Subject to
Articles 17 and 18, Articles 3 to 15 shall apply to collective
marks.
Article 17
(a)
- An application for
registration of a collective mark shall designate the mark as a
collective mark and shall be accompanied by a cop; of the
regulations governing the use of the collective mark.
(b)
- The registered owner of a collective mark shall notify the
Registrar of any changes made in respect of the regulations referred
to in paragraph (a).
Article 18
In addition
to the grounds provided in Article 13.(a) and (b), the Registrar
shall invalidate the registration of a collective mark if the person
requesting the invalidation proves that only the registered owner
uses the mark, or that he uses or permits its use in contravention
of the regulations referred to in Article 17.(a) or that he uses or
permits its use in a manner liable to deceive trade circles or the
public as to the origin or any other common characteristics of the
goods or services concerned.
Back to top
Chapter
5
Licensing
of Marks
Article 19
(a)
- Any license contract
concerning the registration of a mark, or an application therefor,
shall provide for effective control by the licensor of the quality
of the goods or services of the licensee in connection with which
the mark is used. If the license contract does not provide for such
quality control or if such quality control is not effectively
carried out, the license contract shall not be valid.
(b)
- The registration of a collective mark, or an application
therefor, may not be the subject of a license contract.
Chanter
6
Trade
Names
Article 20
A name or
designation may not be used as a trade name if by its nature or the
use to which it may be put, is contrary to public order or morality
and if, in particular, it is liable to deceive trade circles or the
public as to the nature of the enterprise identified by that name.
Article 21
(a)
- Notwithstanding any laws or
regulations providing for any obligation to register trade names,
such names shall be protected, even prior to or without
registration, against any unlawful act committed by third parties.
(b)
- Any subsequent use of the trade name by a third party,
whether as a trade name or a mark or collective mark, or any such
use of a similar trade name or mark, likely to mislead the public,
shall be deemed unlawful.
Back to top
Chanter
7
Acts
of Unfair Competition
Article 22
Any act of
competition contrary to honest practices in industrial, commercial,
service matters shall be considered as act of unfair competition.
Article 23
The following
acts, in particular, shall be deemed to constitute acts of unfair
competition:
(a)
- all acts of such a nature as to create confusion by
any means whatever with the establishment, the goods, or the
industrial, commercial or service activities of a competitor;
(b)
- false allegations in the course of trade of such a
nature as to discredit the establishment, the goods, or the
industrial, commercial or service activities of a competitor.
(c) - the manufacturing process, the characteristics, the
suitability for their purpose, or the quantity of the goods.
Back to top
Chanter
8
Infringement
and Remedies
Article 24
Subject to
Article 12, an infringement of a registered mark shall consist of
the performance of any act referred to in Article 11 in Cambodia by
a person other than the owner of the mark and without the agreement
of the latter.
Article 25
An
infringement of a registered well-known Mark shall consist of
the use of a sign identical with or confusingly similar to the
well-known mark without the agreement of the owner of the
well-known mark provided that the sign is used:
(a)
- in relation to goods and services identical with or similar
to the goods and services for .which the well-known mark has
been registered, or
(b)
- in relation to goods and services which are not identical
with or similar to those in respect of which the well-known
mark has been registered and the use of the sign in relation to
these goods or services would indicate a connection between those
goods and services and the owner of the well-known mark and
that the interests of the owner of the well known mark are likely to
be damaged by such use.
Article 26
An
infringement of an unregistered well-known mark shall consist
of the use of a sign identical with or confusingly similar to the
well-known mark without the agreement of the owner of the
well-known mark provided that the sign is used in relation to
goods or services identical with or similar to the goods or services
for which the mark is well-known.
Article 27
On the
request of the owner of the mark or of a licensee if he has
requested the owner of the mark to institute court proceedings for
specific relief and the owner of the mark has refused or failed to
do so, the court may grant an injunction to prevent infringement. an
imminent infringement, or an unlawful act referred to Articles 21.
22. 23. award damages and grant any other remedy provided for in the
general law.
Article 28
On the
request of any competent authority or any interested person,
association or syndicate, in particular of producers, manufacturers
or traders, the court may grant the same relief in case of an act of
unfair competition referred to in Articles 22 and 23.
Back to top
Chapter
9
Provisional
Measures
Article 29
On .the
request of the applicant, the Court shall order prompt and effective
provisional measures to prevent an infringement, an imminent
infringement or to preserve relevant evidence in regard to the
alleged infringement.
Article 30
Where
appropriate, in particular where any delay is likely to cause
irreparable harm to the right holder or where there is a
demonstrable risk or evidence being destroyed, the Court may order
provisional measures provided that the applicant has furnished:
(a)
- any reasonably available evidence satisfying the
Court with a sufficient degree that the applicant is the right
holder and that the applicant's rights are being infringed or that
such infringement is imminent, and
(b)
- the required security or equivalent assurance sufficient to
protect the defendant and to prevent abuse. This required security
should be under the determination of the court.
Article 31
Where a
provisional measure has been ordered, the defendant shall be given
notice of the decision at the time of the execution of the measures.
Article 32
Where
provisional measures have been ordered under Article 30 and 31, the
defendant may file a request for review with the Court within 15
working days from the notification of the decision. In the review
proceedings, the Court shall give the parties concerned an
opportunity of being heard and shall review and confirm, modify or
revoke its decision within a reasonable period, as specified by the
law.
Article 33
Where the
applicant does not initiate proceedings leading to a decision on the
merits of the case within 20 working days, from the notification of
the decision ordering provisional measures or within any other
reasonable period determined by the Court in its decision, the Court
shall revoke the provisional measures upon the request of the
defendant.
Article 34
Where the
provisional measures are revoked or where the Court decides on the
merits of the case in proceedings under Article 33 initiated by the
applicant that there has been no infringement or threat of an
infringement, the Court shall order the applicant upon the request
of the defendant, to provide the defendant appropriate compensation
for any injury caused by the execution of the provisional measures.
Back to top
Chanter 10
Border
Measures
Article 35
The owner of
any registered trademark may make application to the customs or the
competent authorities or court to suspend clearance of goods
suspected of being counterfeit by proving that he is the owner of
the registered mark.
Article 36
Any
application under Article 35 should be presented in writing and
should be accompanied by:
(a)
- an extract from the register of marks;
(b)
- a statement of the grounds for the application, and in
particular the prima facie evidence showing that such trademark
goods are counterfeit;
(c)
- a complete description of the goods on or in connection with
which the trademark is used, together, where appropriate (or
requested), with a sample of the bona fide product;
(d)
- the name and address of the applicant and of his
representative (alternatively: full details of the applicant. as
prescribed);
(e)
- an authorization from the owner of the registered trademark,
where the application is filed by an authorized representative, and
(f)
- the prescribed fee in accordance with the determination of
the Ministry of Economy and Finance.
Article 37
Within 10
working days of the receipt of an application under Article 35, the
customs or competent authorities shall notify the applicant whether
the application has been granted or rejected or reserved for further
consideration.
Article 38
Customs or
other competent authorities, specified by Sub-Decree, shall
have authority to require the applicant to provide a security or
equivalent assurance sufficient to protect the importer, consignee,
exporter or owner of the goods and the competent authorities Such security or equivalent assurance shall be determined in a
manner which does not unreasonably deter recourse to this procedure.
Article 39
Upon granting
an application under Article 35, the customs shall suspend clearance
of the goods referred to in the application. The suspension shall
remain in force for the initial period, and any extension thereof
which is not more than 10 working days.
The customs
shall immediately inform the importer and the applicant of the
suspension of the clearance of the goods. and shall state the
reasons of such suspension. The customs shall also notify the
importer of the name and address of the applicant.
Article 40
If, within a
period not exceeding 10 working days after the applicant has been
served notice of the suspension, the customs authorities have not
been informed that proceeding leading to a decision on the merits of
the case have been initiated by a party other than the defendant, or
that the duly empowered authority has taken provisional measures
prolonging the suspension of the release of the goods, the goods
shall be released, provided that all other conditions for
importation or exportation have been complied with; in appropriate
cases, this time‑limit may be extended by another 10 working
days. If proceedings to a decision on the merits of the case have
been initiated, a review, including a right to be heard, shall take
place upon request of the defendant with a view to deciding, within
a reasonable period, whether these measures shall be modified,
revoked or confirmed.
Article 41
Back to top
The relevant
authorities shall have the authority to order an applicant to pay
the owner, the importer, the exporter and the consignee of the goods
appropriate compensation for injury caused to them through the
wrongful detention of goods or through the detention of goods
released pursuant to Article 39. In case of any party does not agree
with this decision, that party has the right to file an appeal
before the court.
Article 42
The customs
or other competent authorities may allow the right holder, importer
or exporter to examine the goods, the clearance of which has been
suspended in accordance with Article 39, and to remove samples for
examination, testing and analysis, to determine whether the goods
are counterfeit.
Where a
positive determination has been made that the goods are counterfeit,
the customs authorities may inform the right holder of the names and
addresses of the exporter, the importer and the consignee and of the
quantity of goods in question. Without prejudice to the protection
of confidential information, the customs or other competent
authorities may, on request, provide the right holder with copies of
documents lodged in respect of such goods or with any available
information or documents relating to any previous importation or
exportation of similar goods by the same importer or exporter.
Article 43
The customs
may, on its own initiative, suspend the clearance of goods in
respect of which it has acquired prima facie evidence that
importation of counterfeit trademark goods is taking place or is
imminent.
Article 44
The customs
shall immediately inform the right holder of the place and date of
the suspension of customs clearance and they may at any time seek
from the right holder any information that may assist them to
exercise these powers.
Article 45
With respect
to acts performed under Article 42, both public authorities and
officials shall be exempted from liability to appropriate remedial
measures where those actions are taken or intended in good faith.
Article 46
The customs
and competent authorities, through the decision of the court, shall
have the authority to order the destruction of infringing goods. The
customs shall not allow the re‑exportation of counterfeit
trademark goods or subject them to different customs procedure.
Article 47
Counterfeit
trademark goods of a non-commercial nature contained in
travelers' personal luggage may be excluded from the application of
this Law.
Back to top
<<< Back Next >>>
|